non-superuser chown(2)s considered harmful
Tom Christiansen
tchrist at convex.COM
Tue Dec 11 14:26:59 AEST 1990
In article <1990Dec11.005644.20688 at cbnewsk.att.com> hansen at pegasus.att.com (Tony L. Hansen) writes:
>The mail(1) command uses chown(2) and set-gid to give a secure mail system. I
>feel that other methods are fraught with potential security holes.
It doesn't on a BSD system, and you're right, this has been the source
of many security holes. Whether we've finally solved them all or not
is unknown.
--tom
--
Tom Christiansen tchrist at convex.com convex!tchrist
"With a kernel dive, all things are possible, but it sure makes it hard
to look at yourself in the mirror the next morning." -me
More information about the Comp.unix.internals
mailing list