Put the internals back in comp.unix.internals!

[Ronnie Kon]

In article <325 at pdxgate.UUCP> griffith at eecs.cs.pdx.edu (Michael Griffith) writes:
>Perhaps I'm wrong, but doesn't internals imply a discussion on the internals
>of Unix? (Which I take to mean things pretty close to a kernel level...)

	Hah!  Just goes to show that **YOU** are not a wizard.  Any wizard
knows that comp.unix.internals is for discussion of renaming the comp.unix.*
heirarchy.  The word "internal" is short for "intermidable."

	:-)
				Ronnie
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ronnie B. Kon                    |  "I don't know about your brain, but
kon at groundfog.stanford.edu       |  mine is really bossy."
...!{decwrl,ames}!mindcrf!ronnie |               -- Laurie Anderson