Call for discussion, COMP.UNIX rereorganisation

[Matthew Farwell]

In article <0EC6YHA at xds13.ferranti.com> peter at ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) writes:
>After looking at other successful hierarchies, I've decided that there are
>a large number of potential UNIX groups that are missing from the comp.unix
>hierarchy...
>
>	comp.unix.wizards	Of, by, and for UNIX wizards
>	comp.unix.hackers	Of, by, and for UNIX hackers
>	comp.unix.gurus		Of, by, and for UNIX gurus
>	comp.unix.rumors	What OSF and UI will do next.
>	comp.unix.reviews	Reviews of UNIX software packages
>	comp.unix.vendors	Notes and complaints about UNIX vendors
>	comp.unix.tech		Technical discussion about UNIX
>	comp.unix.embedded	Embedded systems running UNIX
>	comp.unix.funny		Humorous articles about UNIX
>	comp.unix.clones	Minix, Coherent, etc...
>	comp.unix.futures	UNIX in the stock market
>	comp.binaries.unix	UNIX binaries, X backgrounds, etc.
>
>By the way, :->

You forgot:-
	comp.unix.discussion	For discussions about comp.unix reorganisations

Dylan.
-- 
Matthew J Farwell                 | Email: dylan at ibmpcug.co.uk
The IBM PC User Group, PO Box 360,|        ...!uunet!ukc!ibmpcug!dylan
Harrow HA1 4LQ England            | CONNECT - Usenet Access in the UK!!
Phone: +44 81-863-1191            | Sun? Don't they make coffee machines?