c.u.wizards vs. c.u.internals

[John F. Haugh II]

In article <26E4EC42.42AB at tct.uucp> chip at tct.uucp (Chip Salzenberg) writes:
>According to jfh at rpp386.cactus.org (John F. Haugh II):
>>How about people who've un-aliased the group after being convinced
>>the name change really was a bad idea?
>
>As for people who think c.u.internals was a bad idea, well, the group
>passed its vote according to the guidelines.  Anyone who thinks it
>should be renamed is free to run another vote.  I should hope that
>administrators will carry c.u.internals in the meantime.

Well, I'm tending to agree with Doug Gwyn.  Doug's statement was
that he wouldn't be able to discuss UNIX internals because his
license prohibited him from doing so.  Since I don't have a copy
of the non-disclosure agreements I signed with AT&T and IBM, I
think I too will have to bow out.

This voting business is really beginning to look pretty silly.
What we really need is a good backbone cabal.
-- 
John F. Haugh II                             UUCP: ...!cs.utexas.edu!rpp386!jfh
Ma Bell: (512) 832-8832                           Domain: jfh at rpp386.cactus.org
"SCCS, the source motel!  Programs check in and never check out!"
		-- Ken Thompson