UNIX semantics do permit full support for asynchronous I/O
Barry Shein
bzs at world.std.com
Mon Sep 3 19:00:43 AEST 1990
From: steve at nuchat.UUCP (Steve Nuchia) [responding to my note]
>>Do there exist any benchmark or other test results which indicate that
>>adding asynch i/o to unix actually yields a performance improvement?
>
>There is little question that it can dramatically speed up selected
>applications.
I guess that's a way of saying "no, I don't know of any results..."
>Applications, mostly in the backup arena (afio, ddd)
>get substancially improved throughput even using really stupid mechanisms.
Backups almost always use raw I/O, how does this affect this
observation?
Is it worth doing for filesystem (disk) I/O?
Why are these mechanisms "stupid"? Are you sure the same speed-up
would be seen with async I/O? Are there any other applications besides
intensive disk to tape which would benefit from this, or might this be
a singular example?
--
-Barry Shein
Software Tool & Die | {xylogics,uunet}!world!bzs | bzs at world.std.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 617-739-0202 | Login: 617-739-WRLD
More information about the Comp.unix.internals
mailing list