POSIX bashing (readline bashing)

[John F Haugh II]

In article <30780009 at hpisod2.cup.hp.com> decot at hpisod2.cup.hp.com (Dave Decot) writes:
>> "-ant" is a suffix - check your Webster's.
>
>If you think that the fact that something is a suffix means it can be applied
>to anything, you're not a very good studant.

No, but a citation for "conformant" was found in an unabridged, which means
that in the case of "conformant", appending -ant to conform is a conformant
use of the suffix ;-)
-- 
John F. Haugh II        | Distribution to  | UUCP: ...!cs.utexas.edu!rpp386!jfh
Ma Bell: (512) 832-8832 | GEnie PROHIBITED :-) |  Domain: jfh at rpp386.cactus.org
"If liberals interpreted the 2nd Amendment the same way they interpret the
 rest of the Constitution, gun ownership would be mandatory."