Fundamental defect of the concept of shared libraries

[Masataka Ohta]

In article <8167 at auspex.auspex.com> guy at auspex.auspex.com (Guy Harris) writes:

>>:Yes, of course. Bnews is the real example showing significance of call
>>:overhead.

>>I cited B news as the real example showing significance of call overhead.
>
>Umm, if call overhead is significant, inlining is a win, right?

I don't care. It has nothing to do with the current discussion. You may
post whatever you believe, but, don't distort what I said.

>>>There are two separate issues here, which you're mixing together:

>>I am not mixing them.
>
>Yes, you're continuing to mix them.  See below.

No. And, again, these points have nothing to do with the current discussion
on shared libraries.

							Masataka Ohta