Regular pipe vs. Named Pipe
Peter da Silva
peter at ficc.ferranti.com
Fri Jun 21 04:43:46 AEST 1991
In article <1991Jun13.184737.6343 at eci386.uucp> woods at eci386.UUCP (Greg A. Woods) writes:
> GRRR! You should really read some market data Dan. There are
> probably several million more "machines" out there running with Named
> Pipes and no Sockets than there are the other way 'round.
That's why he said "supports message queues and UNIX domain sockets". That
is to say:
#ifdef BSD
... code for sockets ...
#else
... code for message queues ...
#endif
So he wasn't as insane as he sounded. However, as a user of one of the
system that supports neither... but does support named pipes... I do disagree
with his conclusion.
--
Peter da Silva; Ferranti International Controls Corporation; +1 713 274 5180;
Sugar Land, TX 77487-5012; `-_-' "Have you hugged your wolf, today?"
More information about the Comp.unix.internals
mailing list