(was slashes, now NFS devices)
Mike Eisler
mre at pyrps5.pyramid.com
Wed Mar 13 05:02:19 AEST 1991
peter at ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) writes:
>In article <147163 at pyramid.pyramid.com> mre at pyrps5.pyramid.com (Mike Eisler) writes:
>> Larry said "general". RFS is capable of doing Intel to Intel transactions
>> as well as anything. However can OpenNet perform device accesses between
>> 386's and Sparcs?
>No, but it *can* do it between DOS and Unix or Xenix. And it can do it between
>VAX/VMS and UNIX or Xenix. I've never run it from DOS to VMS.
NFS works between all those architectures and operating systems.
> (i.e., I presume the point your making is that it's not Open if it's
> limited to intel. Last I heard intel didn't make VAXes. They don't
Last I heard, Sun doesn't make VAXes either. But the platform they sell NFS
on is a VAX. If Intel choses to limit their product to Intel chips, then
no it isn't open.
> necessarily make the CPUs in random DOS machines, either, but that's
> a nit-pick. In any case if they can run it on DOS they should certainly
> not have any difficulty with SunOS.)
Cross architecture device accesses are very hard to do, because the
byte ordering may be different. VAXes and Intel machines order bytes
the same, so yeah, OpenNet can work. But hell will likely freeze over
before you'll see OpenNet work in ALL cases between a Sparc and 386,
M68k and 386, etc. Suppose one has a custom driver foo, and a custom
ioctl foobar for it that moves 32 bit integers from the kernel to the
application and vice-versa. Now an applicaton running on the SPARC
system issues ioctl foobar to /dev/foo, where /dev/foo lives on a
remote Intel server. How is OpenNet going to the byte swapping?
Sun realized that a transparent hetereogenous device sharing solution
was impossible, so rather than attempt to sell the world some snake
oil, they settled for regular file and directory sharing. If they had
done otherwise, contributors to this discussion would have blasted Sun
for designing a file sharing protocol that locked out little endian
architectures.
-Mike Eisler
mre at pyramid.com
More information about the Comp.unix.internals
mailing list