Shared Lib Question (ISC)
Brandon S. Allbery KB8JRR/AA
allbery at NCoast.ORG
Sat May 11 11:12:13 AEST 1991
As quoted from <162 at titccy.cc.titech.ac.jp> by mohta at necom830.cc.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta):
+---------------
| In article <276 at rwing.UUCP> pat at rwing.UUCP (Pat Myrto) writes:
| >I have noticed with interest the discussion going on regarding shared
| >libraries. However, what is obvious is that there are several kinds
| >of shared libaries, all using some different scheme to operate.
|
| It proves that the concept of shared libraries is not so simple.
+---------------
No, it proves that anything, regardless of its simplicity, can be made
arbitrarily and unnecessarily complex. SVR3 shared libraries are a pretty
good example of that. But it does NOT mean that any given complex
implementation is proof that the *concept* is complex.
Quite aside from the other complexities underlying such things as varying
shared library implementations: marketing decisions, for example. Now
THERE'S a complex system for you to try to unravel. Good luck --- you'll need
it.
++Brandon
--
Me: Brandon S. Allbery Ham: KB8JRR/AA 10m,6m,2m,220,440,1.2
Internet: allbery at NCoast.ORG (restricted HF at present)
Delphi: ALLBERY AMPR: kb8jrr.AmPR.ORG [44.70.4.88]
uunet!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!ncoast!allbery KB8JRR @ WA8BXN.OH
More information about the Comp.unix.internals
mailing list