Microport V/AT Printer Spooler non-Problem
Der Tynan
dtynan at sultra.UUCP
Tue Dec 6 09:31:50 AEST 1988
In article <1559 at ssc.UUCP>, fyl at ssc.UUCP (Phil Hughes) writes:
>
> About 1 hour later they called back. Things had stopped working. An
> lpstat showed the old "printer spooler bug" - idle printer but files in
> the queue. This is only one data point but it sounds to me like there is
> a difference between Centronics and Centronics compatible.
>
> Phil Hughes, SSC, Inc. P.O. Box 55549, Seattle, WA 98155 (206)FOR-UNIX
One thing I would check for, is the printer buffering. A "Centronics"
interface is just that. An interface. A lot of older printers don't have
any kind of buffering, which means that you have to feed it data at the
print rate. This can result in an interrupt-per-character type arrangement,
which can kill even the best operating system :-( On newer printers, once
you get the interrupt, you can handshake in a lot of chars at once, meaning
that the latency is a lot less. It seems to me, that the driver/printer
interface is getting confused. This could be a result of heavy interaction.
Note however, that I don't use Microport UN*X, so the above is nothing more
than idle speculation, given the information posted. Hope it helps...
- Der
--
dtynan at zorba.Tynan.COM (Dermot Tynan @ Tynan Computers)
{apple,mips,pyramid,uunet}!Tynan.COM!dtynan
--- If the Law is for the People, then why do we need Lawyers? ---
More information about the Comp.unix.microport
mailing list