Ridiculous(ly slow) tty driver
Andy Valencia
vandys at hpindda.HP.COM
Thu Jun 9 02:16:17 AEST 1988
/ hpindda:comp.unix.microport / bill at carpet.WLK.COM (Bill Kennedy) / 10:52 pm Jun 6, 1988 /
>... The key
>difference is that Xenix is not UNIX System V, V/AT is. There is no way to
>compare a system that passes SVID with one that doesn't. That can't keep
>you from preferring one over the other, but you can't stand them alongside
>each other unless they have something more in common than your opinion.
Wait! Hooooooold it! I'm blowing my whistle. Something makes me suspect
that you're using SCO's old System-3 port. You're right, it was a dog. But
XENIX for the '286 (from SCO) was one of the BETA sites for SVVS. Their
System-V port. The one they've been shipping for years. And they
DO pass it! Their '386 UNIX product also passes it. When comparing SCO
to uPort, it's a lot closer to apples:apples than you think--you just have
to stop looking at (very) dated versions of their product.
Andy
vandys%hpindda.UUCP at hplabs.hp.com
More information about the Comp.unix.microport
mailing list