Info needed: UNIX for 286/386 machines (really malloc)
Derek E. Terveer
det at hawkmoon.MN.ORG
Mon Mar 7 23:55:54 AEST 1988
In article <165 at bdt.UUCP>, david at bdt.UUCP (David Beckemeyer) writes:
> Now that I know "standard" UUCP, how hard is it to learn, and setup HDB UUCP?
I would say that h+d uucp is just as easy ("hard"?) to set up as stock uucp.
In fact, its somewhat less frustrating. I don't know about the rest of the
world, but after administrating experience with 6 machines, i have had day-time
nightmares concerning the "evil USERFILE". Quite a few of my networking
problems went away after upgrading to h+d. Principally, i don't have to spend
a lot of my time baby-sitting the connections, lest my disk runneth over (like
a babbling brook) from all the files sitting around waiting for the brain
damaged stock uucp to send them. (it gets into wedged wait states fairly
easily, you see)
Anyway -- to summarize (and to cut myself off, mercifully) i think the change
over to h+d is well worth the time.
--
Derek Terveer det at hawkmoon.MN.ORG uunet!rosevax!elric!hawkmoon!det
More information about the Comp.unix.microport
mailing list