flames are on!

[The Beach Bum]

In article <7063 at icdi10.uucp> fr at icdi10.uucp (Fred Rump from home) writes:
>In article <1972 at spdcc.COM>, dyer at spdcc.COM (Steve Dyer) writes:
>> In article <1948 at turnkey.TCC.COM> sandy at turnkey.TCC.COM (Sanford 'Sandy'
>> Zelkovitz) writes and writes and writes (and not for the first time):
>> 
>< Jeezus, man, keep this kvetching for the BBS airwaves or save it for
>< your shrink.  No one gives a damn, OK?  Gad I can't stand people who
>< Yap, yap, yammer, yammer.
>< Steve Dyer
>It's terrible to have people on the net who only wish to hear themselves
>propagated.
>If you don't like what somebody has to say, don't read the damn stuff. Turn
>the system off. Get off the net - whatever. But don't jump all over a guy for
>serving as feed for a lot of software SOME people may want.

But this doesn't give Sandy the right to carry on the religious tirade
which he had engaged in.  After two or three times it is definitely a
good idea to let it rest.

The discussion should LONG have been taken to e-mail or alt.flame.

Many of the people in comp.unix.xenix have paid a visit to my system.
I do not get up on a horse [ except from time to time ] and cram my
opinions down someones throat.

Sandy needs to accept the fact that there are ingrates and just live with
it.  If I was running this system for the gratitude I receive, I'd have
pulled the plug months ago.  However, the occassional Thank-You note
[ plus 254 YES votes for comp.archives ;-) ] is indication enough to me
that what I do is appreciated, even if some asshole makes a stink like
the joker who started slamming Sandy in the first place.
-- 
John F. Haugh II (jfh at rpp386.Dallas.TX.US)                   HASA, "S" Division

      "Why waste negative entropy on comments, when you could use the same
                   entropy to create bugs instead?" -- Steve Elias