Hard Disks for AT
Seth J. Bradley
sjb at dalek.UUCP
Thu Sep 15 13:13:36 AEST 1988
In article <8198 at alice.UUCP> debra at alice.UUCP () writes:
>ST 251-1. Do not buy the ST 251. The "-1" supposedly gives you a 28ms
>access time. What it really means is that you get the 40ms out of the
>ST 251-1 while the ordinary ST 251 is slower.
I disagree. I have a system with a Seagate ST4051 and a ST251
(not ST251-1). I just ran coretest on the two drives. Coretest
is a DOS based drive performance test program that treats the
drives as raw devices. It reads in a large block of data and
gives performance data. Here is the results of the test I just
ran:
Drive Average Access Transfer Rate Overall Performance
ST4051 38.1 ms 160.6 KB/Sec 2.398
ST251 38.4 ms 162.6 KB/Sec 2.399
Looks like the 251 stacks up well against the 4051 in
performance. Don't know about reliability though.
--
Seth J. Bradley UUCP: uunet!lll-winken!dalek!sjb
Internet: lll-winken.llnl.gov!dalek!sjb
More information about the Comp.unix.microport
mailing list