How does Microport System V/AT handle bad blocks?
Michael Grenier
mike at cimcor.mn.org
Wed Feb 1 11:40:49 AEST 1989
>>They didn't know it was fsck causing the problem until Steve took one of
>>their service techs through crashing a large file system and showed him
>>how fsck would corrupt it. This only happened a couple of months ago.
>
> Actually, they have been aware of it for much longer than that... Well
> over a year ago we were experiencing the same problem and had MANY
> long discussions with them regarding it. They informed us that there
> was a known problem with fsck, and that "someone is working on it".
> This was with the 1.3.6 release. As of the 2.2 release it still was
> not fixed.
True, however Microport DOES have a version (probably beta only) that
works fine up to file partitions in the 1/2 gigabyte region (.i.e 1024K
blocks). I know because mine is working fine on this 180K block
partition. It now runs in large model and no longer needs a temp file
and thus doesn't corrupt file systems by using it.
I don't know when it will be released officially but you could probably
get the beta version with a call to John Plocher at Microport.
-Mike Grenier
mike at cimcor.mn.org
More information about the Comp.unix.microport
mailing list