vi, yes; emacs, no
Pete Holsberg
pjh at mccc.UUCP
Fri Mar 3 01:06:12 AEST 1989
Dyna 386 with Microport 3.0e.1
Strange, strange, strange! I have this machine, et130, connected to a
3B2/400, mccc, via a short-haul modem at 9600 bps. The only problem I
have is when I try to edit a file remotely using emacs -- the screen
gets gaps and redrawing it doesn't help. This does not happen when I
use vi! (!!!) Screen edits seem to be perfect.
Anyone have any idea why these two editors should behave differently? I
should point out that there is no difference when I call mccc from a PC
(running MSDOS) using a Telebit Trailblazer at 19200 or 9600 bps! (!!!)
If I use AT386 as my TERM value on the Dyna, what should I use on mccc?
I.e., where can I get a corresponding terminfo entry? Oh, maybe I can
infocmp the 386 one???
Thanks for the help. See you at Trenton Computer Festival.
Pete
--
Pete Holsberg UUCP: {...!rutgers!}princeton!mccc!pjh
Mercer College CompuServe: 70240,334
1200 Old Trenton Road GEnie: PJHOLSBERG
Trenton, NJ 08690 Voice: 1-609-586-4800
More information about the Comp.unix.microport
mailing list