Protection from "rm *"
Conor P. Cahill
cpcahil at virtech.uucp
Sat Sep 29 22:02:23 AEST 1990
In article <1990Sep29.043909.2577 at smsc.sony.com> dce at smsc.sony.com (David Elliott) writes:
>In article <853 at agcsun.UUCP> jackm at agcsun.UUCP () writes:
>>I don't like aliasing rm to a shell that copies things to a ".deleted"
>>directory, so don't tell me about those.
>
>Me neither. I also don't like aliasing rm to "rm -i".
>From your posts, it sound like you guys want to go back to the old V6 and
possibly PWB shell days where an rm with a "match" character (either * or ?)
would result in a [glob confirm] msg. For example:
% ls
Makefile
test
test.c
test.o
% rm * .o
Makefile test test.c test.o .o
[glob confirm]
And you would have to type a y to really remove the files. This would
protect you from the problem.
When we upgraded to a System III machine, our users had all kinds of problems
when this "feature" went away.
--
Conor P. Cahill (703)430-9247 Virtual Technologies, Inc.,
uunet!virtech!cpcahil 46030 Manekin Plaza, Suite 160
Sterling, VA 22170
More information about the Comp.unix.misc
mailing list