pause(2) vs. sigpause(3)
Dan Bernstein
brnstnd at kramden.acf.nyu.edu
Wed Oct 31 15:58:49 AEST 1990
In article <717 at inews.intel.com> bhoughto at cmdnfs.intel.com (Blair P. Houghton) writes:
> Why obsoleted a perfectly simple system call with a
> library function?
Here it's pause(3) and sigpause(2). What machine are you using?
> (BTW, neither of them is ANSI C; I don't know which might
> be in POSIX).
POSIX imitated the BSD signal facilities, with some helpful additions.
It made sigpause() into sigsuspend(). The difference is that the
argument is a ``sigset_t'' manipulated by macros.
---Dan
More information about the Comp.unix.programmer
mailing list