shared memory

BURNS,JIM gt0178a at prism.gatech.EDU
Wed Sep 26 20:31:39 AEST 1990


in article <13991 at hydra.gatech.EDU>, gt0178a at prism.gatech.EDU (BURNS,JIM) says:
[deleted]

In my above reply, for some reason, it got marked as Followup:
comp.lang.c, which is NOT what I intended. I don't normally read that
group, but I suscribed to it just to find out if my question at the end of
that post got answered, and it didn't. So one more time:

HP-UX documents it; it tests out on A/UX 1.1 and Ultrix 4.0 : the first
call to shmat() (by any process) automatically zeroes out the shm seg, so
explicit initialization is NOT necessary. Is this standard? Which one?

-- 
BURNS,JIM
Georgia Institute of Technology, Box 30178, Atlanta Georgia, 30332
uucp:	  ...!{decvax,hplabs,ncar,purdue,rutgers}!gatech!prism!gt0178a
Internet: gt0178a at prism.gatech.edu



More information about the Comp.unix.programmer mailing list