wanted: information on Duff's Device -

[John Chambers]

	[History of "Duff's Device"]

> 	send(to, from, count)
> 	register short *to, *from;
> 	register count;
> 	{
> 		register n=(count+7)/8;
> 		switch(count%8){
> 		case 0:	do{	*to = *from++;
> 		case 7:		*to = *from++;
> 		case 6:		*to = *from++;
> 		case 5:		*to = *from++;
> 		case 4:		*to = *from++;
> 		case 3:		*to = *from++;
> 		case 2:		*to = *from++;
> 		case 1:		*to = *from++;
> 			}while(--n>0);
> 		}
> 	}
> 
> Disgusting, no?  But it compiles and runs just fine.  I feel a combination
> of pride and revulsion at this discovery.  If no one's thought of it before,
> I think I'll name it after myself.

Uh, why is this disgusting?  It strikes me as simple and elegant.  I have
severe doubts that any minimally-competent C programm would have even the
slightest trouble understanding it.  It's not tricky, convoluted, confusing,
or anything else negative.  So why would someone object to it?

Myself, I think that people object to simple, elegant things just because
they are simple and elegant [but I don't claim to read minds. ;-]

What I was hoping for was a simple, elegant solution that involved a goto.
Now THAT would offend people!  Oh, well, maybe next time.

Of course, I would have put the while before the loop, but then, I'm rather
paranoid.  For n==0, the above code will copy 8 bytes, which could cause a
SEG fault, and guess whose routine dbx/sbd/whatever would finger?

































[To satisfy the line count daemon.]
-- 
Zippy-Says: Imagine ... a world without clothing folds, chiaroscuro, or marital difficulties ...
Home: 1-617-484-6393 Work: 1-508-952-3274
Uucp: ...!{harvard.edu,ima.com,eddie.mit.edu,ora.com}!minya!jc (John Chambers)
Uucp-map: minya	adelie(DEAD)