adb
Doug Gwyn
gwyn at smoke.brl.mil
Tue Mar 12 05:07:46 AEST 1991
In article <7606 at mentor.cc.purdue.edu> 23n at sage.cc.purdue.edu writes:
> ... heard about adb and I wonder what its good for.
I use it in preference to the so-called "source level" debuggers
in most cases, because it works at a level closer to the actual
machine, which is sometimes necessary and almost always asking
more than the source-level debuggers can provide. (However, "pi"
is very nice, if you have it. I use "dmdpi" for debugging Blit-
family downloaded processes.) Unless you are expert at machine-
language interpretation and have a good idea of the code generated
by your compiler, you're probably better off in most cases working
with a source-level debugger.
>Are there any tutorials around about its use?
Yes, for example in Volume 2 of the 7th Edition UNIX Programmer's
Reference Manual. It does address a specific architecture (PDP-11),
so some of the details will be different for other architectures.
>If it's not worth learning now, what would I want to pick it up for?
We don't know what your values are,
so we can't tell you what you should decide.
More information about the Comp.unix.programmer
mailing list