UUCP Port Turnaround (==> Unix Kernel hacks)
jim at strath-cs.UUCP
jim at strath-cs.UUCP
Wed Feb 18 22:59:44 AEST 1987
In article <3233 at rsch.WISC.EDU> mcvoy at rsch.WISC.EDU (Lawrence W. McVoy) writes:
>.. the people at CMU have something called MACH .... It's a message
>passing kernel based on Accent that is binarily compatible with 4.3BSD on
>Vax, source compatible elsewhere. It's supposedly well designed,
>easy to maintain, and has some new features that make Unix look sick (like
>copy-on-write MM, used to get pass-by-value saftey with pass-by-reference
>speed, msg based so networking is cake, user loadable drivers, pagers, etc).
Granted MACH has lots of interesting things in it, but it is HUGE. Even
a BSD kernel pales into insignificance. I recall someone from CMU saying
that their development kernel had a 700K text segment! OK - it may have
had lots of redundant code for development work, but I can't see how MACH
could be smaller than a comparable Berkeley kernel with all these nice new
ideas that CMU are implementing.
The MACH kernel source might be prettier, but can we afford the extra core
needed to run it? :-)
Jim
More information about the Comp.unix.questions
mailing list