Ultrix `fort' vs BSD `f77'
Chris Torek
chris at mimsy.UUCP
Mon Jan 19 15:55:57 AEST 1987
>In article <748 at imagen.UUCP> geof at imagen.UUCP writes:
>>... On Unix, you can easily construct a fortran code beautifier
>>with a simple shell command. Just use:
>> % rm *.f77
>>:-)
In article <251 at skatter.UUCP> kuo at skatter.UUCP (Dr. Peter Kuo) writes:
>I would gladly use this shell command! We found that the new Ultrix FORTRAN
>is at least 3-4 times faster than f77, even though a few bugs have been found
>in fort.
Does that mean it *compiles* 3-4 times faster, or that the code *runs*
3-4 times faster after having been compiled? And what code?
The 4.2BSD f77 compiler was pretty bad; the 4.3 compiler is much
more correct, and the runtime libraries, now written in Vax assembly,
are much faster, but I would be greatly surprised to find that even
the ported VMS compiler could beat even the old 4.2 f77 by a factor
of four, except on carefully selected benchmarks.
--
In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Univ of MD Comp Sci Dept (+1 301 454 7690)
UUCP: seismo!mimsy!chris ARPA/CSNet: chris at mimsy.umd.edu
More information about the Comp.unix.questions
mailing list