Remote File Sharing (RFS) - SVR3
Monkey Face@unixprt
monkey at unixprt.UUCP
Wed Jan 7 14:33:22 AEST 1987
In article <7478 at utzoo.UUCP>, henry at utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer) writes:
> Unfortunately, licensing SVR3 is not something that can be taken for granted,
> since the license contains some troublesome clauses about mandatory SVID
> compliance that have made a lot of vendors think twice about it.
It seems appropriate that if you have a UNIX port based on SVR3, that at
least one of the environments available to the user is SVID compliant.
I do not believe that this this disallows having other 'known'
environments available.
Application writers need to have a finite set of environments
to address their work to, else so many things will only run on very
specific environments (like now).
Several vendors are providing this multi-environment solution already.
Monkey Face - Uni-xperts, Milpitas CA
(408) 946-6572
More information about the Comp.unix.questions
mailing list