why p->member ?
ark at alice.UUCP
ark at alice.UUCP
Wed Aug 10 05:25:36 AEST 1988
In article <474 at sp7040.UUCP>, jsp at sp7040.UUCP writes:
> It needs to be referenced as a pointer. To do that use:
>
> *p.member
>
> it is the same as
>
> p->member
I'm going to ignore the original question and merely point out that
*p.member
means the same as
*(p.member)
which, in turn, is quite different from
p->member
In fact,
p->member
means the same thing as
(*p).member
More information about the Comp.unix.questions
mailing list