vi documentation
Kay Dekker
kay at warwick.UUCP
Sat Jul 16 05:38:20 AEST 1988
In article <178 at skep2.ATT.COM> wcs at skep2.UUCP (46323-Bill.Stewart.[ho95c],2G218,x0705,) writes:
>In article <16364 at brl-adm.ARPA> rbj at cmr.icst.nbs.gov (Root Boy Jim) writes:
>:? tomf at boulder.Colorado.EDU (Tom Fredericks) writes:
>:? > I could also use some vi docs. If anyone knows of a book or has
>:? > some 'complete' docs in a file I would really appreciate it.
>:You must be running TPC UNIX or you wouldn't have to ask.
> [Look, Root Boy, we ain't TFPC any more!]
>Mr. Cottrell is suggesting that Berkeley UNIX comes with good vi
>documentation (which it does), and that System V doesn't (which it
>doesn't.)
And why not? Oh - I see - additional documentation - additional money -
after all, who uses screen editors? :-(
disgustedly,
Kay
"I AM; YOU ARE; HELLO: all else is poetry"
... mcvax!ukc!warwick!kay
More information about the Comp.unix.questions
mailing list