DWB ownership (was: vi vs emacs in a student environment)

[Timothy Reed]

In article <8206 at brl-smoke.ARPA> gwyn at brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn>) writes:
>In article <144 at wash08.UUCP> I write:
>>(however, since INteractive now
>>owns nroff and troff, maybe theirs are the true standards of tomorrow -:)

>And in a posting a few days ago, someone said that SoftQuad's enhanced
>tools were the new official release of DWB.

Many apologies, my misstatement - we're in the midst of
INteractive/SoftQuad wars at my job and I'm getting alittle confused!  -
SoftQuad's formatters are the new, official documenters workbench. 
~
~
~
"Timothy_Reed_American_Chem_Soc" 23 lines, 1152 characters