labelit/volcopy.
Duke Mangum
dwm%asbf-cs.huachuca-em.arpa at huachuca-em.arpa
Wed Jun 29 06:11:06 AEST 1988
Hope someone out there has an answer to this problem :
I'm the SA on a Unisys ( Sperry ) 5000/80. A week or so ago, I was getting
ready to do some file system volcopies. The target device for the volcopies
is a 1600 bpi Cypher tape drive. The first file system I went to volcopy
required three reels, so I executed 'labelit' on these three reels
preparatory to using them. I used labelit as follows ( the reel/volume
names changed for each reel, of course ) :
labelit /dev/rmt/c0d0h work 1462 -n
I next used labelit to verify the labels on the three tapes. So far, so
good ! I then did the volcopy - no problems. The next file system I
needed to volcopy required two reels. I used labelit ( -n ) as above to
label these tapes; however (comma) when I then used labelit to verify the
labels, I got a 'printout' of the labels followed by the nastygram :
"illegal blocksize=512"
Subsequent attempts to get around this, using different variations of
everything I could think of, produced no change. Finally, I decided to go
ahead and try the volcopy. The file system I was volcopying has a partition
size of 50024 blocks. At the end of the volcopy execution, the blocks
copied figure was 100048 blocks. 'Restoring' from these tapes produces
the same block count, however a subsequent 'df -t' shows the partition
to be the expected size.
What is irritating is that, if memory serves me correctly, I had this same
problem on our Gould 6032 about two years ago, but I do NOT remember what
caused it and how I finally got around it; I just remember that I did.
I called this situation in on the Unisys 'hotline', but they seem to feel
( at the moment, anyway ) that this is not a problem !
If anyone out there has a solution to this problem, I would *really*
appreciate it. If I didn't have a memory fault in this sector, it wouldn't
BE a problem. Many (hopeful) thanks in advance.
More information about the Comp.unix.questions
mailing list