ZIM vs PROGRESS
Tom Betz
tbetz at dasys1.UUCP
Fri Jun 24 05:24:23 AEST 1988
x
In evaluating 4GL/RDBMS products available for Xenix 386, with an
aim of using one of these to develop an order proccessing/inventory
management/production database system, I've come down to a choice
between Zim and Progress... and right now I'm leaning toward Zim, for
several reasons:
1: Zim has a richer set of built-in mathematical functions, while
retaining all the capabilities of Progress.
2: Zim's set- and entity-based approach (including ROLES, a sort
of aliasing) appeals to my sense of how a business is actually
structured. I do feel a bit of discomfort at letting go of arrays,
since Zim does not employ them, but I also feel that the power offered
by set handling will easily offset this.
3: Zim's self-documentation features far outstrip Progress's.
One example - when one adds or deletes a field from a file, one needs
must recompile any compiled procedures using that file. Zim is kind
enough to tell you which procedures need to be recompiled, so you are
less likely to miss one. This could save a lot of grief in an OLTP
system!
4: Progress automatically compiles every procedure before running
it, while Zim permits considerable debugging in an interpreter, then
lets the user decide when it's time to compile. Zim even permits
compiled procedures to call uncompiled procedures, and vice-versa!
Zim's approach, while offering considerable power to the user, also
leaves itself open to some hazards (if the interpreted procedure
happens to return something the procedure calling it doesn't
anticipate) but I think the power it offers is well worth the
tradeoff.
These are just a few of the points I have observed in a couple
weeks' part-time exploration of these two packages.
I would very much appreciate comments from anyone who has used
either or both of these packages regarding points I may have missed or
should look out for... also from partisans of other 4GL packages that
can offer reasons why I'm missing the boat here.
As usual, if sufficient response is generated, I will summarize to
the Net.
--
Tom Betz
ZCNY {bellcore,cmcl2}!cucard!dasys1!tbetz
Yonkers, NY, USA 10701-2509
"Opinions? What opinions? These are >facts<!!"
More information about the Comp.unix.questions
mailing list