Packet size & number of windows in UUCP (AT&T licensing policy)
Lee McLoughlin
lmjm at doc.ic.ac.uk
Tue Mar 1 07:10:40 AEST 1988
In article <3313 at briar.Philips.Com> rob at philabs.Philips.Com (Rob Robertson) writes:
>|> a source license can compile it for a neighboring site that has only a binary
>|> license, and give them the binary.
>
>>I think that this should be checked before being acted upon. Once upon a time,
>>I asked about doing just such a thing. (It was even in the context of UUCP!)
...
>>royalty, even if the recipient of the program already had a copy from a
>>different vendor and had already paid a binary royalty.
Its daft licensing like this that convinced me to start on a PD version
of uucp some time ago. I was beaten to it by uuslave and friends
(which came out while I was still arguing with various people about a
whole bunch of legal wrangles to do with duplicating the uucp protocols
- something deeply ironic there). I plan on trying to make something
as powerful as UKUUCP but based on uupc(?) - time permitting. Then I
can post it! Make life so much easier.
Lee.
--
UKUUCP SUPPORT Lee McLoughlin
"What you once thought was only a nightmare is now a reality!"
Janet: lmjm at uk.ac.ic.doc, lmcl at uk.ac.ukc
DARPA: lmjm at doc.ic.ac.uk (or lmjm%uk.ac.ic.doc at nss.cs.ucl.ac.uk)
Uucp: lmjm at icdoc.UUCP, ukc!icdoc!lmjm
More information about the Comp.unix.questions
mailing list