Bourne Shell Comments Problem

[Doug Gwyn]

In article <375 at stiatl.UUCP> meo at stiatl.UUCP (Miles O'Neal) writes:
>In article <292 at dsacng1.UUCP>, nab1382 at dsacng1.UUCP (Dick Hauser) writes:
>A comment indicator in column1, line 1, indicates the script is
>a csh script instead of sh.

Any Bourne shell that acts this way is BROKEN.
Nearly all Bourne shell scripts I have encountered in the past
several years start with #.