Why /dev/dsk/* and no /dev/tty/*?
Peter da Silva
peter at ficc.uu.net
Sat Apr 8 09:07:06 AEST 1989
The really really big thing that clutters up /dev is all those tty devices.
There are dozens more of those than there are disks, tapes, memory, and so on.
So why did AT&T move all the disks into /dev/dsk/* and leave all those ttys
out there? I know that you can't REALLY call it /dev/tty/whatever, because
/dev/tty is a historical relic, but what's wrong with having SOME sort of
/dev/t/whatever arrangement?
--
Peter da Silva, Xenix Support, Ferranti International Controls Corporation.
Business: uunet.uu.net!ficc!peter, peter at ficc.uu.net, +1 713 274 5180.
Personal: ...!texbell!sugar!peter, peter at sugar.hackercorp.com.
More information about the Comp.unix.questions
mailing list