Unix without tar?
Joe Smith
jes at mbio.med.upenn.edu
Thu Aug 31 00:22:33 AEST 1989
Recently, someone asserted that tar archives aren't a suitable
distribution format because they aren't understood by every Unix.
Given some reasonable constraints of their contents (ascii files,
names < 14 chars), is this true? Doesn't every Unix have tar? I know
there has been some (d)evolution of tar, but aren't simple archives
still portable? With the availability of GNU tar (and others ?)
which are portable enough to run on other OS's, I found the assertion
hard to believe, but I couldn't refute it.
<Joe
--
Joe Smith
University of Pennsylvania jes at mbio.med.upenn.edu
Dept. of Biochemistry and Biophysics (215) 898-8348
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6059
More information about the Comp.unix.questions
mailing list