VISUAL/EDITOR = emacs in ksh
Donald Lashomb
donlash at uncle.UUCP
Wed Dec 13 13:42:19 AEST 1989
In article <464 at cpsolv.UUCP> rhg at cpsolv.uucp (Richard H. Gumpertz) writes:
>I am using ksh on a AT&T 7300 (operating system release 3.51, which is roughly
>equivalent to V 2) and have a few questions:
>1) What is the difference between using VISUAL=emacs and EDITOR=emacs? Why
> should I prefer one over the other?
If you set VISUAL to a pathname that ends in emacs, gmacs, or vi, then ksh
turns on the corresponding option no matter what EDITOR is set to - no default.
EDITOR, same thing but can be overridden by VISUAL and defaults to /bin/ed.
I usually set both of these and EDIT too, to all the same editor. Some
programs you might use look at EDITOR, some look at EDIT.
>2) My .profile does VISUAL=emacs followed by export VISUAL. Although this
> defines $VISUAL, it does not appear to set emacs editing mode. For that
> I have to type VISUAL=emacs manually to the shell. Why does ksh look at
> just the variable and not the environment? What can I do to get around
> this?
Check out your ksh ENV file (.kshrc probably), .profile runs first, then ksh
does ENV. AT&T-supplied .kshrc does "set -o vi -o viraw", this is overriding
your VISUAL setup in .profile. Change it to "set -o emacs".
>3) I would like to run the equivalent of a .profile in every sub-ksh that I
> start. How do I go about doing that? That is, execute a script file and
> then enter interactive mode upon invocation of ksh.
The ENV file is executed everytime ksh is invoked.
TFB (The F***ing Book) =
The Kornshell Command and Programming Language
Morris I. Bolsky and David G. Korn
Prentice Hall
hope this helps - Donald Lashomb
More information about the Comp.unix.questions
mailing list