Getting rid of a <defunct> process
Blair P. Houghton
bph at buengc.BU.EDU
Mon Feb 13 10:11:29 AEST 1989
In article <27866 at bu-cs.BU.EDU> madd at bu-it.bu.edu (Jim Frost) writes:
>
><defunct> processes (also called "zombies") definitely take up process
>table entries and probably take up many more resources. Exactly what
>a zombie process holds depends on the operating system implementation.
You betcha! We were getting a bit bogged-down on our uVAX, with a
no-load load of 1.0. Then somebody who knew suggested doing a shutdown
-r to kill the zombies. Thirty minutes and one reboot later (it's a
_big_ uVAX), the no-load load was at 0.03. Yow. Speeds up everything
from logins to buggy Spice.
The word is apparently to do a shutdown every few weeks to kill
all the zombies.
--Blair
"That, or wear garlic around
your neck...no, that's how
you ward off VMS...to kill zombies
you need silver bullets...er...
where's the F.M.?"
More information about the Comp.unix.questions
mailing list