malloc(3) vs. malloc(3x)
Gordon Cross
crossgl at ingr.com
Tue Jan 10 01:09:35 AEST 1989
In article <1418 at leah.Albany.Edu> rds95 at leah.Albany.Edu (Robert Seals) writes:
>How much can a single malloc get? And why does Ultrix have 2 kinds of
>malloc, while 4.3-tahoe (the first one, I think) only has 1?
The difference between malloc(3C) and malloc (3X) is speed: the latter version
runs on average about 9 times faster. The algorithm used is optimized for
speed at the expense of memory efficiency. If you are going to do LOTS of
mallocs, the 3X version is usually preferable.
--
Gordon Cross UUCP: uunet!ingr!crossgl "all opinions are
111 Westminister Way INTERNET: crossgl at ingr.com mine and not those
Madison, AL 35758 MA BELL: (205) 772-7842 of my employer."
More information about the Comp.unix.questions
mailing list