SysV bcopy?
Guy Harris
guy at auspex.UUCP
Sun Mar 26 12:31:24 AEST 1989
>One other point which no one else seems to have raised yet: the return
>value.
I think the reason nobody raised this is that the return value of
"memcpy" is, in most cases, singularly useless; if I'd wanted the value
of the first argument to "memcpy", I would have used it directly. I
cannot remember *ever* having used either the return value of "memcpy"
*or* the return value of "strcpy" in any code I've written.
More information about the Comp.unix.questions
mailing list