multiport boards
Larry Snyder
larry at nstar.UUCP
Thu Sep 21 22:28:31 AEST 1989
> I use Consensys Powerports up here. I have tested many ports cards
> and have found the Powerports to be the most reliable. It supports
> bi-directional hardware flow control that does not "skid" . It has
> other features like powerview (multiple login sessions on one dumb
> terminal (not 'X' or layers(1) )) and transparent printing. It does
> not eat an interrupt and fits either into the DOS ram space or out
> in REAL memory at the 14-16 meg window. I have four Microcom 9624's
> runing off it as well as a 5620 terminal and most of my Ham radio
> gear and I have not found a problem with it yet.
> They are in Toronto, Canada and thier phone number is 940-2900
Well - latest news - I bought one of the Digiboard PC8i (12.5 mhz
80186 - their top of the line 8 channel board) and the drivers
worked perfectly with serial terminals and one way modem communications -
but big problems with bi-directional communications like the dropping
of DTR on ALL 8 CHANNELS (even in the middle of a UUCP transfer)
when changing from outgoing back to incoming on one of the modem lines.
The Digiboard went back yesterday.
Yesterday, I traded some hardware for a Hostess board - an 8 channel
dumb serial card that is supported under SCO (BTW - the SCO tech reference
notes are incorrect on the address of the ports - I had to go into
/usr/sys/io/sioconf.c and check the address). Anyhow - this board (even
though no smarts) is working dandy under SCO. Now I get to see (if and
how much) a dumb port can tie up the system!
Now I can move on to multiple controllers!
--
Larry Snyder SCO Xenix 2.3.2 '386
uucp: iuvax!ndcheg!ndmath!nstar!larry
The Northern Star Usenet Distribution Site HST / PEP / V.22
Notre Dame, Indiana USA Home of the fighting Irish!
More information about the Comp.unix.questions
mailing list