printf implementation
Chris Torek
chris at mimsy.umd.edu
Fri Feb 2 12:03:36 AEST 1990
In article <29007 at amdcad.AMD.COM> srini at diablo.amd.com writes:
>I would like to know why printf is implemented separately for shells
>(like in C shell)? I know one reason - efficiency. Are there others?
csh has its own private printf because csh did not quite fit on a
PDP-11 without split I&D, and Bill Joy chipped a bit here and a bit
there to make it fit. One of the chips was stdio.
>Also, how is printf implemeted (upto the _write level) in library?
>It calls a function _doprnt. What happens from there?
What makes you think it calls _doprnt? Mine calls vfprintf.
--
In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Univ of MD Comp Sci Dept (+1 301 454 7163)
Domain: chris at cs.umd.edu Path: uunet!mimsy!chris
More information about the Comp.unix.questions
mailing list