FAQ posting frequency
cctal!andrew at relay.eu.net
cctal!andrew at relay.eu.net
Tue Jan 16 23:15:00 AEST 1990
I am new to UNIX and to this mail group and thus surprised that this makes me
qualified to contribute to the debate on something! (most of the stuff is
foreign language to me, but that is part of the learning process).
On the question of the frequency of FAQ posting, my view is: keep the FAQ
posting to once a month or so, but post a list of the questions that are
answered in FAQ every week. That might cut down on neophyte questions.
It would also be helpful if the FAQ, perhaps, even, an expanded version, was
available from an easy mail access point. Here, in England, we have a software
system called "info-server" that allows you to send a mail msg to a system and
it will mail you back what you ask for. Comp.sources is stored here using this
technique.
You must bear in mind the psychology at work; we are all very keen to use
something new as soon as we have mastered the rudiments of making it work. You
were all once at the stage I am now; remember how keen you were. They want to
try it *now*, not next week, or when the next FAQ comes round (and which they
won't know about anyway, because they won't have seen one).
Two final suggestions: the comment about automatically mailing out FAQ to new
group subscribers is a good idea, perhaps along with some "network etiquette".
Alternatively, local sysops could give new users on systems a printout of FAQ.
Lastly, a plea: this distribution is read world-wide; could those of you in
the US please bear this in mind when using US-specific abbreviations and brand
names. Even the two letter state codes may be impenetrable to overseas
readers. Remember also that there must be a great many other readers who, like
me, know far too little about UNIX yet to contribute but who read the net
chatter to learn.
Regards
Andrew Hardie
..!ukc!cctal!andrew
London, England.
More information about the Comp.unix.questions
mailing list