Historical question: LF vs. CR\LF in text files
Peter da Silva
peter at ficc.ferranti.com
Fri Jun 1 02:05:03 AEST 1990
In article <7581 at tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM> toma at tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM (Tom Almy) writes:
> I have used several systems that went the single character route using the
> Carriage Return. This is probably the most sensible because input conversion
> is not necessary.
However, the ASCII code set includes the recommendation that *if* a single
character is used for "new-line" it be the "line-feed" character. The reason,
I assume, is that a single carriage-return is more useful for translating
Fortran carriage-control to ASCII.
> I know that the net is full of UNIX-myopic people, but UNIX was not first nor
> did it make the best move on this one.
They might not have been the first, but it's more useful to be able to
generate a single CR than a single LF on your output.
--
`-_-' Peter da Silva. +1 713 274 5180. <peter at ficc.ferranti.com>
'U` Have you hugged your wolf today? <peter at sugar.hackercorp.com>
@FIN Dirty words: Zhghnyyl erphefvir vayvar shapgvbaf.
More information about the Comp.unix.questions
mailing list