Why does "cal 9 1752" produce incorrect results?

Nikolaos Tsivranidis nick at esacs.UUCP
Fri Nov 30 01:57:08 AEST 1990

Previous message (by thread): Why does "cal 9 1752" produce incorrect results?
Next message (by thread): Why does "cal 9 1752" produce incorrect results?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

	Forget why 'cal 9 1752' doesn't work. Who was the
brilliant (wo)man who wrote this program? Simply amazing!

					- nick -

Previous message (by thread): Why does "cal 9 1752" produce incorrect results?
Next message (by thread): Why does "cal 9 1752" produce incorrect results?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Comp.unix.questions mailing list