Math Coprocessors
Alan H. Mintz
alan at mq.com
Wed Nov 14 11:03:53 AEST 1990
In article <1990Nov12.032526.17125 at mccc.uucp>, pjh at mccc.uucp (Pete Holsberg) writes:
> The question came up recently as to whether or not a math coprocessor
> would be a useful addition to a UNIX computer system. One of us said
> that it would not unless the programs that were being run used floating
> point and/or extended integer arithmetic. The other said that one will
> find relatively few programs which do not do at least SOME floating
> point or extended integer math, even if it is not explicitly present in
> the program it may be present in a library routine.
The SCO XENIX 386 O/S definitely makes use of the FPU if it is available
(according to SCO). I'll try and run some benchmarks with/without in a couple
days, but it definitely "feels" faster.
Most SCO applications will use FPU's also. Some Foxbase+ results:
Task time/without time/with
Video Speed 20 20
Tight Loop 52 20
File Creation 26 20
Small Record Processing 77 20
Large Record Processing 64 20
Text Export/Import 20 20
Simple Math 48 20
Complex Math 176 20
--
< Alan H. Mintz | Voice +1 714 980 1034 >
< Micro-Quick Systems, Inc. | FAX +1 714 944 3995 >
< 10384 Hillside Road | ...!uunet!mq!alan >
< Alta Loma, CA 91701 USA | alan at MQ.COM >
More information about the Comp.unix.questions
mailing list