Exabytes ....

[Phil Howard KA9WGN]

hugh_davies.wgc1 at rx.xerox.com writes:

>Whilst we use their excellent tape drives all over the place, am I the only
>person who's irritated by the name "exabyte", which is in fact 1000 terabytes,
>and not the name of a sort of tape drive? Is this "truth in advertising" since
>we'd need about 500,000 of them to make a *real* terabyte?

>Never mind. It's Friday night and I've been in meetings all day ....

You are not the only one.  Though that should be 500 for a terabyte and
500,000 for a real exabyte.

They probably chose NOT to use "Terabyte" because people would have dubbed
them "Terrible".
-- 
 /***************************************************************************\
/ Phil Howard -- KA9WGN -- phil at ux1.cso.uiuc.edu   |  Guns don't aim guns at  \
\ Lietuva laisva -- Brivu Latviju -- Eesti vabaks  |  people; CRIMINALS do!!  /
 \***************************************************************************/