`which' in csh/Ultrix 4.1
Juergen Wagner
gandalf at csli.Stanford.EDU
Tue Mar 5 22:37:00 AEST 1991
There seems to be some weirdness with `which' under Ultrix 4.1.
Here is the story:
A long time ago, I wrote a "which" of my own, a program which also
told me about multiple occurrences of files, which followed symbolic
links, etc. (if given the proper options). This morning, I compiled
that program under Ultrix 4.0 (on a DecStation 3100) to see how it
worked. The result was the following (imagine, bin/which were my
personal 'which'):
foo% rehash
foo% which which
/u/gandalf/bin/which
foo% which -a which
At this point, I expected to see /u/gandalf/bin/which and /usr/ucb/which
appear on my screen. Aaarrggh! What happened was
No -a in /u/gandalf/bin/which /usr/ucb /usr/bin /bin ...
/u/gandalf/bin/which
Ok. Trying to find out what's going on, I noticed that there were
actually three "which"s around: my own, the /usr/ucb one, ...and...
a built-in which os Ultrix' csh.
Great, I thought, why not make it a built-in? I can always rename my
own "which" to "Which".
What seemed to be a little strange, however, was how the built-in
"which" behaved when I tried it on some well-known programs:
foo% which ls
No ls in .... Yes, there is /bin in my path!
foo% which nslookup
/usr/ucb/nslookup but /usr/local/bin comes first
in my path, and there *IS* an
nslookup, too.
Does anybody have any comments on this? I am not sure whether the
behavior of "which" described above is a bug or a feature... besides,
it is not documented as a built-in.
--Juergen Wagner (gandalf at csli.stanford.edu)
PS: Please, copy my e-mail address on any followups since I do not
read this newsgroup regularily.
More information about the Comp.unix.shell
mailing list