'386 Unix Wars
James Van Artsdalen
james at bigtex.cactus.org
Thu Dec 27 20:09:32 AEST 1990
In <355 at metran.UUCP>, jay at metran.UUCP (Jay Ts) wrote:
> And it won't markedly improve the functioning of their existing
> software, either.
| Well, what about job control, BSD-style line editing (I'm not sure
| what BSD calls this), long file names, etc? Something in there seems
| useful.
> Job control, line editing? Do you think that office workers use the shell?
> Mostly, they are entering data and making menu selections.
Sounds like their existing software is Mess-DOS.
> Long file names are a noticeable improvement. Well, maybe. Just
> offhand, I don't remember seeing any truncated filenames in users'
> home directories. Not many, anyway.
Even Mess-DOS has line editing.
The only thing about SysVr4 an "office worker" is likely to really
notice is that TCP/IP and NFS work much better than SysVr3, and then
only if they're running over NFS or something. The big win for SysVr4
is for the programmer.
--
James R. Van Artsdalen james at bigtex.cactus.org "Live Free or Die"
Dell Computer Co 9505 Arboretum Blvd Austin TX 78759 512-338-8789
More information about the Comp.unix.sysv386
mailing list