'386 Unix Wars

[John F Haugh II]

In article <2812 at cirrusl.UUCP> dhesi%cirrusl at oliveb.ATC.olivetti.com (Rahul Dhesi) writes:
>For business purposes I recommend SCO.  Although I personally haven't
>used SCO Xenix, I did use Microsoft's Xenix on a number of different
>machines in the past, and it was more stable than System V/AT or ESIX.

I've used SCO Xenix on this machine (a 386) for 3 1/2 years, and it works
very well.  The original purpose for this system was to develop business
software for clients who would eventually be running SCO Xenix.

For clients with no on-site technical experience, SCO Xenix is probably
your best bet.  It's sad that SCO UNIX is in such a sorry state.  There
are no "industrial strength" UNIX ports out there, and I was hoping at
least SCO would have something with all the newer features.
-- 
John F. Haugh II                             UUCP: ...!cs.utexas.edu!rpp386!jfh
Ma Bell: (512) 832-8832                           Domain: jfh at rpp386.cactus.org
"While you are here, your wives and girlfriends are dating handsome American
 movie and TV stars. Stars like Tom Selleck, Bruce Willis, and Bart Simpson."