UNIX and security <was: Unix & X-Windows on 386SX>

[Richard Foulk]

>	Sorry, Tim, can't agree. Despite all the references to UNIX' "inherent
>lack of security", even plain-vanilla UNIX supports a higher security
>potential than many OS alternatives, even those of "commercial quality".
>
> [...]
>
>	I do find it telling that the first C2 certified system (Gould) and
>the first B1 certified system (System V/MLS) were UNIX systems.

What's so telling about Unix having something added to it before other
operating systems?  Name another OS where source code is available.


-- 
Richard Foulk		richard at pegasus.com