Another <sys/sioctl.h> / <sys/ptem.h> query

[david.r.connet]

In article <50005 at bigtex.cactus.org>, james at bigtex.cactus.org (James Van Artsdalen) writes:
> 1. Does AT&T SysVr3.2 have <sys/ptem.h>?
Yes.  3 machines that I'm on:
	iwtng iwtng 3.2.1 3 3B2
	cbnewsc cbnewsc 3.2.2 3 3B2
	iwwlb iwwlb 3.2 2.2 i386

> 2. If not, which add-on package of AT&T SysVr3.2 adds this file?
> 
> At this point, the consensus seems to be to drop <sys/sioctl.h> in all
> configurations and to use <sys/ptem.h> instead.  It is believed that
> there are few systems with <sys/sioctl.h> that do not also have
> <sys/ptem.h>, and that ISC no longer sells this configuration.
None of these systems have <sys/sioctl.h>.

Dave Connet
dcon at iwtng.att.com